The Bisheff Blog
Analyzing and commenting on what's hot in sports

There’s No All-Time Lakers Without West

Look, let me make this simple. Jerry West IS the Lakers.

Everybody keeps coming out with these All-Time Lakers teams, and the more I see them, the more I can’t believe them. Most of them don’t include West.

They put Kareem Abdul-Jabbar at center, Magic Johnson and Kobe Bryant at guards and, usually, Elgin Baylor and James Worthy at forwards.

Hey, that’s a nice team. It’s just not the best team. The best team should have the five best players in Lakers’ history. And they are, unequivocally, Abdul-Jabbar, Baylor, Magic, Kobe and . . .you got it, West. I know, know, some of you will say that makes three guards. No big deal. You put Magic at the point, West at the shooting guard and move Kobe to the 3, where he plays a lot, anyway.

Don’t get me wrong, I think Worthy was a terrific player. But most of those picking him must be too young to remember Jerry. Because as good as Worthy was, he didn’t belong in the same league as West.

Trust me, if Jerry had been around in the days of SportsCenter and cable TV and the internet, you’d be watching his highlights all day long. How good was he? Scary good. Good enough to average more than 40 points for an entire playoff series. As a guard. On the same team as Baylor.

And you know how great Kobe has been at the end of games? West was better for a longer period. I know that’s hard to believe, but you trust the late Chick Hearn, right? There was a reason he called Jerry Mr. Clutch. It was the same reason the NBA used West’s silhouette in the league logo.

West could shoot better and quicker than any of today’s Lakers. Or anybody in the league now, for that matter. His jumper was pure artistry. He could drive. He could pass. And oh, how he could play defense.

The only reason West and Baylor didn’t win a handful of NBA titles is that Bill Russell, only the greatest winner in sports history, happened to be playing for Boston at the time. And even that wouldn’t have mattered if Elgin and Jerry had only been a few inches taller.

Polls like these always seem to favor the more recent players. I understand that. But nothing should diminish how good West and Baylor were. You talk about fun to watch. When those two got hot, it would rank right up there with Showtime at its best.

Now allow us to consider for a second West’s post-playing career. Let’s see, he was the one who brought Shaq to L.A. Then he made one of the great draft day trades in NBA history to land Kobe. And although I know he had retired as Memphis GM, I’m still not convinced he didn’t have something to do with bringing Pau Gasol to the Lakers.

Add it all up and there is nobody — that’s right, nobody — who has been more important than West in franchise history, Jerry Buss included.

So, please, the next time you read about somembody’s All-Time Lakers team and it doesn’t have West on it, just do what I do.

Stop right there. The rest isn’t worth reading.

Leaving Jerry West off an All-Time Lakers first team would be like leaving Sandy Koufax off an All-Time Dodgers team. It isn’t just wrong.

It is unthinkable.

— Steve Bisheff


3 Responses to “There’s No All-Time Lakers Without West”

  1. Thank you Steve for explaining what I have been preaching for many years! Can you imagine if there was the three point line back then? West’s scoring totals would be much different!

    Quick story: I was bartending poolside at the Westin Mission Hills in Rancho Mirage in the early 90’s. Up walks Happy Hairston to sit at my bar. I told him West and Goodrich were a better back court combo than Magic and Scott. He just said “I appreciate what you are saying”!

  2. Steve, you were never more correct than you are on this one. Jerry West is the all-time Laker and its not even close. The previous poster mentioned Happy Hairston, who was probably as good as Worthy but hardly ever gets mentioned. West, Goodrich, Hairston, McMillan and Chamberlain, the members of the 71-72 team (Baylor retired earlier in the year), were, in my opinion, not only the greatest Laker team but the greatest of all time in the NBA. That team won 33 games in a row, nuff said. You mentioned Jerry’s contributions as a player and an executive. Don’t forget that he was not a bad coach, either. His problem was that he though everyone should do the things he did as a player.

  3. No. 44 has to be on there, of course, and moving Bryant to the ‘3’ is a smart and easy move to put the best five on the floor.

    No. 52 — Hairston — was a good rebounder, but not much of an offensive guy. But with Goodrich and West, and Wilt hitting a couple when needed and McMillian’s baseline J, Harold did not need to score much.

    Now the next mission — rank the Lakers championship teams, i.e. which group wins a seeded playoffs?

    I think this year’s team might be the “weakest” of the LA championship teams. Chamberlain or Abdul-Jabbar would kill Bynum, their teams had much better depth, too.
    Although Bryant and Gasol can be matchup nightmares — put Magic on Bryant … Chones on Gasol? McAdoo? Or … ?? Nixon or Scott vs. Fisher … don’t forget about Cooper …

    Tackle that one, Bish.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: